HOOKED ON GOLF BLOG


Not Liable for Non-Errant Golf Shots?

Written by: Tony Korologos | Wednesday, April 20th, 2016
Categories: Boneheads • Golf

I’ve pondered this situation before, but with a little different text.
20160419_162632
Right of hole #13 there’s a new “Urban Fishery.” If you slice the hell out of a drive you might bean a fisherman. But the sign says the golfer is responsible for “errant” shots.  Does this mean that if I intentionally bean one of the fishermen in the urban fishery by executing a perfect and intentional shot, that I’m not responsible?  Am I also not responsible for errant shots that are hit somewhere else than in the urban fishery?

Any attorneys out there care to comment?  LOL.

2 responses to “Not Liable for Non-Errant Golf Shots?”

  1. databat says:
    April 21, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    So given my perpetual and wicked slice I better stay off that course. Or use a putter on 13!

Please Rake the Bunkers
Common golf injuries and how to treat them

LATEST POSTS

Top Golf Tips to Warm Up Your Play During the Winter Months

RoundHouse Provisions by Chuck Norris

Cool Tunes! TravisMathew Igloo Tee Up for Golf-Inspired Cooler Collection

HOG World Tour Visits Logan River Golf Course

Imagine if you shattered your wife’s ankle with a golf shot like Joe Buck did

LATEST REVIEWS

RoundHouse Provisions by Chuck Norris

Cool Tunes! TravisMathew Igloo Tee Up for Golf-Inspired Cooler Collection

The CON.STRUCT Green Hotdog Dog Polo is for Hot Dogs on or off the Golf Course

FACTORFIVE Anti-Aging Cream Review

New Favorite Hoodie from Real Golfers – The Flop Shot
Facebook

1,800+ FOLLOWERS


HOG Twitter

4,000+ FOLLOWERS


TK Twitter

5,000+ FOLLOWERS


Instagram

500+ FOLLOWERS


YouTube

5,500,000+ VIEWS


Google+

400+ FOLLOWERS